Failure to Comply With Court Scheduling Order Prevents Wife From Presenting Evidence.

In the case of Nina T. Daniel v. Selden L. Daniel, an unpublished opinion of the Virginia Court of Appeals, the trial court did not err in granting motion in limine ordering appellant could not present any evidence, in finding appellee traced a separate property contribution into the marital home, in imputing income to appellant, and in awarding attorney’s fees to appellee because appellant did not comply with the court’s scheduling order.